
Yipes, I have not updated this site in a few weeks! And I still have 10 more galleries to bring me up to date with my latest dive trip.
So lets take a look at my photos from my dive trip to Catalina on 9-14-03. Well, first off, I fired off about 30 shots but only came up with about 4 usable photos. I was shooting only macro with my manual strobe loaded with my super-diffuser cap. The vis was terrible for this dive trip. We started west of Parson’s Landing then moved east to Parson’s itself and then on to two more dives at Emerald Bay. The vis got worse as we moved east, until the last dive I could barely see my hand at arms length away from my face. Getting only four good photos out of 30 was not a great session. I’ve had better.
As far as the photoshopping, shooting macro with a strobe, if properly exposed, doesn’t require much. And I was getting a nice ocean color background instead of the “Moonscape Black” backgrounds I see on most underwater macro shots. Yeesh I hate that, you wouldn’t take a photo of friend on a sunny day and induce a black background and call it a good photo would you? Why do people find that acceptable in underwater photos? IMHO, an underwater background should never be black unless the photo was taken at night. Okay, rant over.
Anyway, I did my first move, the first move all underwater photographers should make, Levels, and that pretty much took care of everything. Except for the photo of the fish. I added a selective color adjustment layer to knock down some of the outrageously strong reds produced my the strobe firing on the purple and red algae on the rocks. The lobster photo could use the same treatment, but there were areas in the photo that needed to be masked out to have this work, as some areas in this particular photo did not need the selective color treatment. I let the photo stand as it is, but if I were to make a print I would go the extra mile and do a little masking and add a selective color adjustment.
Most photographers don’t understand selective color, and that is okay, because it really is not a “photography” color correction tool, it is actually a “scanning” color correction tool. Many photographers that are interested and/or curious about photoshop don’t realize that the program was not initially developed as a tool to process photography, but as a tool to scan photography and process scanned photography. Only after the advent of widespread digital photography and quality digital cameras, did photoshop begin adding more purely photography based tools to what was originally a drum scanning and color correction program.